Ayanna Howard
立场时间线 5 条 · 5 个议题
同一议题按时间排列，说法变化一目了然。
人们真正想要的完美是机器人适应人类不完美能力，而非100%准确遵守人造规则。
“我们真正想要的是机器人适应我们能力的完美，而不是遵循我们自己制定的规则的百分百准确的完美。(I think that's some of the disconnect is that we really want perfection with respect to its ability to adapt to us. We don't really want perfection with respect to 100% accuracy with respect to the rules that we just made up anyway.)”
来源访谈 →机器人算法造成危害的伦理责任在于算法开发者，开发者必须对后果负责。
“杀死人的不是机器人算法，而是机器人算法的开发者。(So robotic algorithms don't kill people, developers of robotic algorithms kill people.)”
来源访谈 →机器人不应被赋予人权，社会可将其归入财产或动物的类别并建立相应的权利规范。
“作为一名机器人学家，我不一定认为机器人拥有人权。但你可以将它们归为财产或动物类别，它们各有不同的权利。(If I think about robots as roboticist, you don't necessarily think of robots as human with human rights. But you could think of them either in the category of property or you can think of them in the category of animals.)”
来源访谈 →不必担心AI出现后消灭人类，因为机器人和AI由人类设计、承载人类价值观，如同亲子关系，爱与关怀的核心纽带不会因后代更聪明而消失。
“机器人和人工智能由人类设计，承载着我们的价值观。我总是将其比作父母与孩子的关系……即使它们更聪明、更富有，核心仍是爱与关怀的关系。(Robots and AI is designed by people. It has our values. I always correlate this with a parent and a child... Even if you're maybe smarter and more have more money and that it's still about this love caring relationship.)”
来源访谈 →机器人（如Rosie）之所以被人们喜爱，是因为它们理解人类并在非常社交的层面上与人互动。
“我认为这是因为它们理解我们，在非常社交的层面上与我们互动。(I think it's because they understand us, it interacts with us at that very social level.)”
来源访谈 →金句墙 5 条
“I think that's some of the disconnect is that we really want perfection with respect to its ability to adapt to us. We don't really want perfection with respect to 100% accuracy with respect to the rules that we just made up anyway.”
我认为脱节在于，我们真正想要的是机器人适应我们能力的完美，而不是遵循我们自己制定的规则的百分百准确的完美。
人机交互的伦理与未来：机器人不应完美 · 2020/1/17“So robotic algorithms don't kill people, developers of robotic algorithms kill people.”
所以，杀死人的不是机器人算法，而是机器人算法的开发者。
人机交互的伦理与未来：机器人不应完美 · 2020/1/17“If I think about robots as roboticist, you don't necessarily think of robots as human with human rights. But you could think of them either in the category of property or you can think of them in the category of animals.”
作为一名机器人学家，我不一定认为机器人拥有人权。但你可以将它们归为财产或动物类别，它们各有不同的权利。
人机交互的伦理与未来：机器人不应完美 · 2020/1/17“Robots and AI is designed by people. It has our values. I always correlate this with a parent and a child... Even if you're maybe smarter and more have more money and that it's still about this love caring relationship.”
机器人和人工智能由人类设计，承载着我们的价值观。我总是将其比作父母与孩子的关系……即使它们更聪明、更富有，核心仍是爱与关怀的关系。
人机交互的伦理与未来：机器人不应完美 · 2020/1/17“I think it's because they understand us, it interacts with us at that very social level.”
我认为这是因为它们理解我们，在非常社交的层面上与我们互动。
人机交互的伦理与未来：机器人不应完美 · 2020/1/17